Estadísticas de Héroes Dota 2
Rastrea estadísticas y calificación de cualquier héroe de Dota 2
| Héroe | Selecciones Pro | Prohibiciones Pro | Victorias Pro | % de Victorias | Índice de Eficiencia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.  Anti-Mage | 1 (1.3%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
2.  Axe | 20 (25.3%) | 39 (49.4%) | 8 | 40% | 3.9 |
3.  Bane | 30 (38%) | 30 (38%) | 18 | 60% | 5.1 |
4.  Bloodseeker | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
5.  Crystal Maiden | 2 (2.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
6.  Drow Ranger | 12 (15.2%) | 49 (62%) | 5 | 41.7% | 4 |
7.  Earthshaker | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
8.  Juggernaut | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
9.  Mirana | 4 (5.1%) | 0 (0%) | 4 | 100% | 6.1 |
10.  Morphling | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
11.  Shadow Fiend | 21 (26.6%) | 40 (50.6%) | 9 | 42.9% | 4.1 |
12.  Phantom Lancer | 1 (1.3%) | 4 (5.1%) | 1 | 100% | 6.1 |
13.  Puck | 25 (31.6%) | 46 (58.2%) | 13 | 52% | 4.9 |
14.  Pudge | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
15.  Razor | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
16.  Sand King | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
17.  Storm Spirit | 20 (25.3%) | 13 (16.5%) | 7 | 35% | 2.9 |
18.  Sven | 2 (2.5%) | 0 (0%) | 2 | 100% | 6.1 |
19.  Tiny | 21 (26.6%) | 23 (29.1%) | 11 | 52.4% | 4.3 |
20.  Vengeful Spirit | 2 (2.5%) | 1 (1.3%) | 1 | 50% | 3.1 |
21.  Windranger | 15 (19%) | 10 (12.7%) | 6 | 40% | 3 |
22.  Zeus | 3 (3.8%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
23.  Kunkka | 3 (3.8%) | 0 (0%) | 1 | 33.3% | 2.1 |
25.  Lina | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
26.  Lion | 10 (12.7%) | 8 (10.1%) | 5 | 50% | 3.5 |
27.  Shadow Shaman | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
28.  Slardar | 3 (3.8%) | 4 (5.1%) | 1 | 33.3% | 2.2 |
29.  Tidehunter | 7 (8.9%) | 4 (5.1%) | 3 | 42.9% | 2.8 |
30.  Witch Doctor | 5 (6.3%) | 0 (0%) | 2 | 40% | 2.5 |
31.  Lich | 12 (15.2%) | 2 (2.5%) | 3 | 25% | 1.9 |
32.  Riki | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
33.  Enigma | 5 (6.3%) | 9 (11.4%) | 2 | 40% | 2.8 |
34.  Tinker | 1 (1.3%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
35.  Sniper | 2 (2.5%) | 3 (3.8%) | 2 | 100% | 6.1 |
36.  Necrophos | 6 (7.6%) | 23 (29.1%) | 4 | 66.7% | 4.7 |
37.  Warlock | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
38.  Beastmaster | 8 (10.1%) | 24 (30.4%) | 3 | 37.5% | 3.1 |
39.  Queen of Pain | 4 (5.1%) | 3 (3.8%) | 2 | 50% | 3.2 |
40.  Venomancer | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
41.  Faceless Void | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
42.  Wraith King | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
43.  Death Prophet | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
44.  Phantom Assassin | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
45.  Pugna | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
46.  Templar Assassin | 3 (3.8%) | 2 (2.5%) | 1 | 33.3% | 2.1 |
47.  Viper | 7 (8.9%) | 32 (40.5%) | 3 | 42.9% | 3.6 |
48.  Luna | 7 (8.9%) | 3 (3.8%) | 1 | 14.3% | 1.1 |
49.  Dragon Knight | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
50.  Dazzle | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
51.  Clockwerk | 23 (29.1%) | 43 (54.4%) | 12 | 52.2% | 4.8 |
52.  Leshrac | 2 (2.5%) | 0 (0%) | 2 | 100% | 6.1 |
53.  Nature's Prophet | 16 (20.3%) | 22 (27.8%) | 5 | 31.3% | 2.8 |
54.  Lifestealer | 8 (10.1%) | 8 (10.1%) | 4 | 50% | 3.4 |
55.  Dark Seer | 11 (13.9%) | 14 (17.7%) | 8 | 72.7% | 5 |
56.  Clinkz | 6 (7.6%) | 5 (6.3%) | 3 | 50% | 3.3 |
57.  Omniknight | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (1.3%) | 1 | 100% | 6.1 |
58.  Enchantress | 10 (12.7%) | 5 (6.3%) | 5 | 50% | 3.4 |
59.  Huskar | 4 (5.1%) | 22 (27.8%) | 2 | 50% | 3.7 |
60.  Night Stalker | 2 (2.5%) | 15 (19%) | 1 | 50% | 3.4 |
61.  Broodmother | 1 (1.3%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
62.  Bounty Hunter | 2 (2.5%) | 0 (0%) | 1 | 50% | 3.1 |
63.  Weaver | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
64.  Jakiro | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
65.  Batrider | 8 (10.1%) | 15 (19%) | 6 | 75% | 5.1 |
66.  Chen | 3 (3.8%) | 1 (1.3%) | 1 | 33.3% | 2.1 |
67.  Spectre | 4 (5.1%) | 9 (11.4%) | 2 | 50% | 3.3 |
68.  Ancient Apparition | 3 (3.8%) | 1 (1.3%) | 1 | 33.3% | 2.1 |
69.  Doom | 20 (25.3%) | 35 (44.3%) | 11 | 55% | 4.7 |
70.  Ursa | 0 (0%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
71.  Spirit Breaker | 4 (5.1%) | 0 (0%) | 2 | 50% | 3.1 |
72.  Gyrocopter | 4 (5.1%) | 1 (1.3%) | 3 | 75% | 4.6 |
73.  Alchemist | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
74.  Invoker | 11 (13.9%) | 8 (10.1%) | 9 | 81.8% | 5.4 |
75.  Silencer | 7 (8.9%) | 6 (7.6%) | 4 | 57.1% | 3.8 |
76.  Outworld Devourer | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
77.  Lycan | 10 (12.7%) | 18 (22.8%) | 8 | 80% | 5.5 |
78.  Brewmaster | 4 (5.1%) | 3 (3.8%) | 2 | 50% | 3.2 |
79.  Shadow Demon | 2 (2.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
80.  Lone Druid | 3 (3.8%) | 75 (94.9%) | 2 | 66.7% | 6 |
81.  Chaos Knight | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
82.  Meepo | 1 (1.3%) | 3 (3.8%) | 1 | 100% | 6.1 |
83.  Treant Protector | 15 (19%) | 61 (77.2%) | 8 | 53.3% | 5.1 |
84.  Ogre Magi | 1 (1.3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
85.  Undying | 13 (16.5%) | 19 (24.1%) | 4 | 30.8% | 2.7 |
86.  Rubick | 18 (22.8%) | 12 (15.2%) | 6 | 33.3% | 2.8 |
87.  Disruptor | 5 (6.3%) | 1 (1.3%) | 3 | 60% | 3.8 |
88.  Nyx Assassin | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
89.  Naga Siren | 0 (0%) | 3 (3.8%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
90.  Keeper of the Light | 19 (24.1%) | 34 (43%) | 11 | 57.9% | 4.8 |
91.  Io | 4 (5.1%) | 12 (15.2%) | 3 | 75% | 4.9 |
92.  Visage | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
93.  Slark | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (1.3%) | 1 | 100% | 6.1 |
94.  Medusa | 6 (7.6%) | 2 (2.5%) | 1 | 16.7% | 1.2 |
95.  Troll Warlord | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
96.  Centaur Warrunner | 13 (16.5%) | 8 (10.1%) | 9 | 69.2% | 4.7 |
97.  Magnus | 4 (5.1%) | 5 (6.3%) | 3 | 75% | 4.7 |
98.  Timbersaw | 3 (3.8%) | 11 (13.9%) | 2 | 66.7% | 4.4 |
99.  Bristleback | 2 (2.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
100.  Tusk | 12 (15.2%) | 11 (13.9%) | 7 | 58.3% | 4.1 |
101.  Skywrath Mage | 2 (2.5%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
102.  Abaddon | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
103.  Elder Titan | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
104.  Legion Commander | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
105.  Techies | 15 (19%) | 0 (0%) | 8 | 53.3% | 3.6 |
106.  Ember Spirit | 26 (32.9%) | 16 (20.3%) | 15 | 57.7% | 4.5 |
107.  Earth Spirit | 15 (19%) | 6 (7.6%) | 10 | 66.7% | 4.5 |
108.  Underlord | 11 (13.9%) | 14 (17.7%) | 5 | 45.5% | 3.4 |
109.  Terrorblade | 7 (8.9%) | 17 (21.5%) | 4 | 57.1% | 4 |
110.  Phoenix | 12 (15.2%) | 2 (2.5%) | 5 | 41.7% | 2.9 |
111.  Oracle | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
112.  Winter Wyvern | 10 (12.7%) | 10 (12.7%) | 6 | 60% | 4.1 |
113.  Arc Warden | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0% | 0 |
114.  Monkey King | 1 (1.3%) | 2 (2.5%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
119.  Dark Willow | 6 (7.6%) | 3 (3.8%) | 3 | 50% | 3.2 |
120.  Pangolier | 10 (12.7%) | 10 (12.7%) | 6 | 60% | 4.1 |
121.  Grimstroke | 5 (6.3%) | 1 (1.3%) | 3 | 60% | 3.8 |
123.  Hoodwink | 28 (35.4%) | 15 (19%) | 13 | 46.4% | 3.9 |
126.  Void Spirit | 8 (10.1%) | 6 (7.6%) | 4 | 50% | 3.4 |
128.  Snapfire | 15 (19%) | 22 (27.8%) | 11 | 73.3% | 5.3 |
129.  Mars | 3 (3.8%) | 1 (1.3%) | 1 | 33.3% | 2.1 |
131.  Ring Master | 12 (15.2%) | 4 (5.1%) | 7 | 58.3% | 3.9 |
135.  Dawnbreaker | 2 (2.5%) | 22 (27.8%) | 1 | 50% | 3.6 |
136.  Marci | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (1.3%) | 0 | 0% | 0.1 |
137.  Primal Beast | 6 (7.6%) | 6 (7.6%) | 3 | 50% | 3.3 |
138.  Muerta | 7 (8.9%) | 7 (8.9%) | 3 | 42.9% | 2.9 |
145.  Kez | 18 (22.8%) | 22 (27.8%) | 10 | 55.6% | 4.3 |
155.  Largo | 17 (21.5%) | 25 (31.6%) | 5 | 29.4% | 2.8 |
Esta página presenta una tabla de estadísticas de héroes de Dota 2 basada en datos de partidas profesionales. La tabla muestra nombres de héroes con iconos, estadísticas profesionales de picks/bans, conteos de victorias, tasas de victoria e índice de eficiencia. Puedes buscar héroes específicos usando el campo de búsqueda arriba de la tabla. Todas las estadísticas se actualizan diariamente y reflejan el meta profesional actual. Es conveniente que las estadísticas estén disponibles en español para una mejor comprensión.
Guía de Colores de la Tabla
Tasa de Victoria %:
- ? Verde – alta tasa de victoria (55% y superior) – héroes con excelente rendimiento
- ? Amarillo – tasa de victoria promedio (45-54%) – héroes balanceados
- ? Rojo – baja tasa de victoria (menos del 45%) – héroes débiles en el meta actual
Barras de Progreso (picks y bans):
- ? Verde – valores muy altos (30% y superior) *
- ? Naranja – valores altos (15-29%)
- ? Azul – valores medios (5-14%)
- ? Rojo – valores bajos (menos del 5%)
Índice de Eficiencia:
- ? Verde Oscuro – excelente eficiencia (7.5+)
- ? Verde – alta eficiencia (6.0-7.4)
- ? Amarillo – eficiencia media (4.5-5.9)
- ? Naranja – baja eficiencia (3.0-4.4)
- ? Rojo – muy baja eficiencia (menos de 3.0)
El Índice de Eficiencia se calcula basado en la tasa de victoria (60%), popularidad de picks (20%) y frecuencia de bans (20%).
Preguntas Frecuentes sobre Estadísticas de Dota 2
Para ver las estadísticas de héroes de Dota 2, utiliza la tabla arriba que muestra datos profesionales actualizados diariamente. Puedes buscar héroes específicos y ver su tasa de victoria, picks/bans y índice de eficiencia en el meta actual.
El índice de eficiencia combina múltiples factores: tasa de victoria (60%), popularidad de picks (20%) y frecuencia de bans (20%). Un índice alto indica que el héroe es tanto exitoso como relevante en el meta profesional.
Las estadísticas de héroes se actualizan diariamente basándose en partidas profesionales recientes. Esto asegura que los datos reflejen el meta actual y las tendencias más recientes en el juego competitivo.
Los colores indican el rendimiento: verde para altos valores (bueno), amarillo para valores promedio, naranja para valores moderados, y rojo para valores bajos. Esto te ayuda a identificar rápidamente los héroes más fuertes en el meta actual.
Busca héroes con alta tasa de victoria (verde) y alto índice de eficiencia. También considera la frecuencia de picks/bans – héroes muy baneados pueden ser poderosos pero arriesgados de elegir. Combina estos datos con tu estilo de juego personal.
No, estas estadísticas se basan específicamente en partidas profesionales de alto nivel. Esto proporciona datos más relevantes para entender el meta competitivo, aunque puede diferir del meta en niveles más bajos de juego.
Absolutamente. Estas estadísticas te ayudan a identificar héroes fuertes en el meta actual, entender tendencias de picks/bans, y tomar decisiones más informadas en el draft. Es especialmente útil tener esta información en español para una mejor comprensión.